Plant-selection and ecological consulting

Make better planting decisions before costly problems take root.

Phytonomen applies botanical knowledge, ecological reasoning, and practical research to plant-selection decisions—so recommendations fit the site, the goals, and the years ahead.

Sunlight filtering through a forest of conifers, deciduous trees, and ferns.

Science-driven

Botanical evidence before assumptions.

Site-customized

Conditions shape every recommendation.

Independent advice

Plant recommendations are not tied to large-corporate product sales.

Long-term value

Choices made for performance over time.

Evidence-informed decisions

Why plant selection matters

Plant selection determines more than appearance. It affects maintenance costs, infrastructure conflicts, plant survival, and the ecological performance of a landscape.

About 70% lower

Annual maintenance costs for native landscaping than turf in one published ten-year comparison.

Up to 12×

Difference in pollinator attractiveness among ornamental plant species in a three-year study.

47.8%

Of average municipal tree-program spending went to pruning and removal in a national census.

Phytonomen evaluates mature size, rooting behavior, soil and moisture conditions, climate, maintenance requirements, invasiveness, and ecological function before recommending a plant.

Published benchmarks illustrate why plant selection matters. Actual costs and outcomes depend on the site, design, establishment, and long-term management.

See how Phytonomen approaches plant selection
Sources and calculation notes
  1. Changing Cost Perceptions: An Analysis of Conservation Development

    The approximately 70% figure is calculated from the source’s published ten-year average annual maintenance estimates for native landscaping and turf.

  2. Nabors et al. 2022, Environmental Entomology

    The study reported differences in pollinator attractiveness among ornamental plant species by as much as a factor of twelve.

  3. Municipal Tree Care and Management in the United States: 2014 Urban & Community Forestry Census

    The census reported that pruning represented 23.3% and removal represented 24.5% of average municipal tree-program spending, totaling 47.8%.

Launch services

Choose the scale of the decision.

Fixed-price services are available across the contiguous United States and Alaska. Online project submission is available. Submitting a project does not create a client relationship or require payment. Phytonomen reviews each request before confirming the scope, terms, timing, fee, and any invoice.

Compare full details

Not sure which service fits? “Help me choose / Request a scope review” is available as a routing option for projects with an uncertain fit. It is not a separate paid product.

Review scope routing

Begin with context

Bring the site, the goals, and the difficult plant questions.

Review what to prepare for a project submission, or visit the contact page for current inquiry options. No payment is taken with an initial consultation request.

Tree TSAR™ — Taxonomy, Systematics, and Review

Tree TSAR™ is Phytonomen’s taxonomy, systematics, and review initiative.

Its pages connect scientific names, common names, phylogenetic relationships, nomenclatural history, morphology, ecology, horticulture, conservation, and supporting literature.

Explore Tree TSAR™

Plants of the Day

Professional perspective

Botanical depth. Ecological context. Independent judgment.

Phytonomen is led by Dr. Philip Crim, a plant ecologist specializing in biodiversity—ecosystem function relationships. Our approach brings plant science, ecology, horticultural performance, taxonomy, and evidence-based decision-making into practical consultation for our clients.

About the practice